11/22/2025
When it was revealed last month that nine Queensland high schools had taught the wrong content for the Year 12 Ancient History external exam, most people were shocked. About 140 students were affected. They spent the year studying Augustus Caesar, only to discover the correct topic was Julius Caesar.
The Queensland Curriculum and Assessment Authority had notified schools of the change back in 2023. Yet the misalignment still slipped through. It should not have happened, but with the way curriculum planning works in many schools, it easily could have.
This is not the first time such a story has broken. In 2017, a school in NSW did the exact same thing in Mathematics. And these are the stories we know about.
Whilst it might be easy to blame the teachers, it’s not their fault. They are expected to keep abreast of all the requirements of a highly complex curriculum issued by state and federal governments. Add on top the fact that curriculums are being regularly updated and it’s a recipe for disaster.
Teachers across Australia are not really provided with any solution to this challenge. They do not work with purpose-built planning systems. Instead, they work on shared drives, loose documents, version chaos, email threads, and a lot of manual checking.
Most faculties and teams rely on:
In this environment, confusion is not surprising. It is predictable.
Each faculty often maintains its own version of the curriculum its suppose to deliver.
But these pieces rarely exist in one place. Leadership teams have limited visibility which makes it extremely difficult to keep on top of what is actually being delivered. Many teachers deliver what they have been provided, trusting that it is correct.
When curriculum planning lives across scattered folders and personal devices, it only takes one outdated document to send an entire cohort down the wrong path.
Most schools cannot quickly answer a simple question:
Can we prove that the entire school is teaching what the curriculum requires?
Not because teachers are careless, but because the system they work in makes accuracy difficult.
Problems arise because:
Errors do not announce themselves. They creep in quietly.
The Queensland incident became a headline because of its scale, but smaller misalignments happen every year in schools everywhere. Units get taught out of order, key outcomes are skipped, content is repeated, or assessments fail to match what was delivered.
These issues do not always make the news, but they affect learning all the same.
Schools need planning systems that reduce the risk of errors and increase visibility. Systems that:
Planuva gives schools a single source of truth for curriculum planning. It allows schools to:
The Queensland incident should not be dismissed as a rare mistake. It should be a wake up call for all of us. Schools deserve tools that make accuracy easy and errors unlikely.